An Update on Exercise Stress Testing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2011.11.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Exercise stress testing is the most commonly used noninvasive method to evaluate for coronary artery disease in men and women. Although emphasis has been placed on the diagnostic value of ST-segment depression, the exercise stress test provides other valuable diagnostic and prognostic data, beyond ST-segment depression. The value of these variables, which include exercise capacity, chronotropic response, heart rate recovery, blood pressure response, and the Duke Treadmill Score, are reviewed in this article. In addition, the gender differences seen with these exercise testing variables are reviewed. In this modern era of exercise stress testing, making use of all the information from a stress test and creating a comprehensive stress testing report are recommended in the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease who undergo exercise stress testing.

Section snippets

ST-Segment Depression

ST-segment depression brought on by exercise stress testing indicates ischemia and may reflect significant coronary obstruction.3 The standard criteria for an abnormal response (positive test) include horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression of equal to or greater than 1 mm (0.1 mV) at 60-80 ms after the J-point (Fig 1).3 The presence of a right bundle branch block or having less than 1 mm ST-segment depression on a baseline ECG is not a contraindication to being able to interpret

Exercise Capacity

Exercise capacity, also known as cardiorespiratory fitness or functional capacity, is 1 of the most important prognostic and diagnostic measures obtained from an exercise stress test. Exercise capacity is an estimate of the maximal oxygen required for any given workload and is measured in units of metabolic equivalents (METs). One MET is the amount of oxygen consumption required in a resting state and equals 3.5 mL of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute for an average adult.38 METs

Chronotropic Response to Exercise

Chronotropic incompetence, or the inability of the heart rate (HR) to increase normally with exercise,17, 55 has important diagnostic and prognostic associations.56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 Several measures of chronotropic response exist, including (1) peak HR achieved with maximal exercise stress testing; (2) HR reserve, or the change in HR with exercise (peak HR with exercise minus resting HR); (3) ability to achieve at least 85% of the maximum age-predicted HR (the definition of age-predicted

HR Recovery

Abnormal HR recovery is defined as an attenuated HR response following exercise cessation. The measurement of HR recover is defined as the peak HR achieved minus the HR at 1 minute of recovery. The definition of an abnormal HR recovery varies and is dependent on what type of recovery protocol is used. For those who undergo an upright-cool-down protocol with a slow walk during the first 2 minutes after exercise, a HR recovery of ≤12 bpm in the first minute of recovery is defined as abnormal.69

HR-Adjusted Measures of ST-Segment Depression: ST/HR Slope and ΔST/ΔHR Index

Methods have been developed to adjust the amount of ST-segment depression to the HR to improve the diagnostic accuracy of ST-segment depression with exercise stress testing. HR adjustment of ST-segment depression may be more accurate than traditional ST-segment depression. Two such measures that have been well-studied include the ST/HR slope the ΔST/ΔHR index.

Blood Pressure Response to Exercise

In strenuous exercise, there is maximal sympathetic discharge and parasympathetic stimulation is withdrawn.87 With increasing exercise, skeletal blood flow increases and peripheral resistance falls. Generally, systolic blood pressure increases and diastolic blood pressure does not change significantly with exercise. There is both diagnostic and prognostic value to abnormalities seen in the blood pressure response to exercise.

Bernard Chaitman: Systolic blood pressure increases with progressive

Duke Treadmill Score

The diagnostic and prognostic values of the exercise stress test have been improved with the creation of scores that combine ECG data with clinical predictors of risk.34, 40, 95, 96 One of the earliest and most commonly used risk scores is the Duke Treadmill Score (DTS), developed by Mark et al.34 This score was developed from 2842 consecutive patients, including 30% women, with known or suspected CAD who underwent an exercise stress test using the Bruce protocol. This was followed by

Summary

The exercise stress test provides a wealth of information, as summarized in Table 1. In patients who undergo exercise stress testing with or without imaging, important diagnostic and prognostic information is readily available and attainable by the exercise stress test, beyond that of classic ST changes. Assessment of exercise capacity is powerful in the prognosis and diagnosis of CAD in both men and women. The use of gender-specific equations relating to predicted exercise capacity and HR

References (103)

  • Y. Kwok et al.

    Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women

    Am J Cardiol

    (1999)
  • J.F. Lewis et al.

    Exercise treadmill testing using a modified exercise protocol in women with suspected myocardial ischemia: findings from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE)

    Am Heart J

    (2005)
  • M.A. Hlatky et al.

    Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiographyMultivariable analysis

    Am J Med

    (1984)
  • M.H. Sketch et al.

    Significant sex differences in the correlation of electrocardiographic exercise testing and coronary arteriograms

    Am J Cardiol

    (1975)
  • J.P. Higgins et al.

    Electrocardiographic exercise stress testing: an update beyond the ST segment

    Int J Cardiol

    (2007)
  • A.P. Morise et al.

    The specificity of exercise electrocardiography in women grouped by estrogen status

    Int J Cardiol

    (1997)
  • D.A. Weiner et al.

    Prognostic importance of a clinical profile and exercise test in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1984)
  • M. Gulati et al.

    Prognostic value of the duke treadmill score in asymptomatic women

    Am J Cardiol

    (2005)
  • R.A. Bruce et al.

    Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease

    Am Heart J

    (1973)
  • J.M. Bourque et al.

    Achieving an exercise workload of > or = 10 metabolic equivalents predicts a very low risk of inducible ischemia: does myocardial perfusion imaging have a role?

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2009)
  • D.A. Weiner et al.

    Long-term prognostic value of exercise testing in men and women from the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry

    Am J Cardiol

    (1995)
  • A.M. Arruda-Olson et al.

    Prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in 5,798 patients: is there a gender difference?

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2002)
  • C.E. Snader et al.

    Importance of estimated functional capacity as a predictor of all-cause mortality among patients referred for exercise thallium single-photon emission computed tomography: report of 3,400 patients from a single center

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1997)
  • L.W. Gibbons et al.

    Maximal exercise test as a predictor of risk for mortality from coronary heart disease in asymptomatic men

    Am J Cardiol

    (2000)
  • C.K. Morris et al.

    Nomogram based on metabolic equivalents and age for assessing aerobic exercise capacity in men

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1993)
  • R.D. Wiens et al.

    Chronotropic incompetence in clinical exercise testing

    Am J Cardiol

    (1984)
  • B. Azarbal et al.

    The incremental prognostic value of percentage of heart rate reserve achieved over myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the prediction of cardiac death and all-cause mortality: superiority over 85% of maximal age-predicted heart rate

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2004)
  • C.M. Pratt et al.

    Exercise testing in women with chest painAre there additional exercise characteristics that predict true positive test results?

    Chest

    (1989)
  • A.S. Adabag et al.

    Relation of heart rate parameters during exercise test to sudden death and all-cause mortality in asymptomatic men

    Am J Cardiol

    (2008)
  • A. Elhendy et al.

    Prognostic significance of impairment of heart rate response to exercise: impact of left ventricular function and myocardial ischemia

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2003)
  • B.L. Wilkoff et al.

    Exercise testing for chronotropic assessment

    Cardiol Clin

    (1992)
  • S.J. Brener et al.

    Chronotropic response to exercise predicts angiographic severity in patients with suspected or stable coronary artery disease

    Am J Cardiol

    (1995)
  • S. Girotra et al.

    Relation of heart rate response to exercise with prognosis and atherosclerotic progression after coronary artery bypass grafting

    Am J Cardiol

    (2009)
  • M.N. Khan et al.

    Chronotropic incompetence as a predictor of death among patients with normal electrograms taking beta blockers (metoprolol or atenolol)

    Am J Cardiol

    (2005)
  • K. Shetler et al.

    Heart rate recovery: validation and methodologic issues

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2001)
  • D.P. Vivekananthan et al.

    Heart rate recovery after exercise is a predictor of mortality, independent of the angiographic severity of coronary disease

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2003)
  • N. Gera et al.

    Usefulness of abnormal heart rate recovery on exercise stress testing to predict high-risk findings on single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in men

    Am J Cardiol

    (2009)
  • P. Kligfield et al.

    Value and limitations of heart rate-adjusted ST segment depression criteria for the identification of anatomically severe coronary obstruction: test performance in relation to method of rate correction, definition of extent of disease, and beta-blockade

    Am Heart J

    (1993)
  • V.F. Froelicher

    Exercise testing in the new millennium

    Prim Care

    (2001)
  • P.M. Okin et al.

    Prognostic value of heart rate adjustment of exercise-induced ST segment depression in the multiple risk factor intervention trial

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1996)
  • S.N. Morris et al.

    Incidence and significance of decreases in systolic blood pressure during graded treadmill exercise testing

    Am J Cardiol

    (1978)
  • S.A. McHam et al.

    Delayed systolic blood pressure recovery after graded exercise: an independent correlate of angiographic coronary disease

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1999)
  • R. Levites et al.

    The significance of hypotension developing during treadmill exercise testing

    Am Heart J

    (1978)
  • A.P. Morise et al.

    Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease

    Am J Med

    (1997)
  • K.P. Alexander et al.

    Value of exercise treadmill testing in women

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1998)
  • A.S. Iskandrian et al.

    The treadmill exercise score revisited: coronary arteriographic and thallium perfusion correlates

    Am Heart J

    (1992)
  • J.H. Mieres et al.

    Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association

    Circulation

    (2005)
  • R. Gianrossi et al.

    Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery diseaseA meta-analysis

    Circulation

    (1989)
  • V.F. Froelicher et al.

    The electrocardiographic exercise test in a population with reduced workup bias: diagnostic performance, computerized interpretation, and multivariable prediction. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Health Services #016 [QUEXTA] Study Group. Quantitative Exercise Testing and Angiography

    Ann Intern Med

    (1998)
  • V.L. Roger et al.

    Sex and test verification biasImpact on the diagnostic value of exercise echocardiography

    Circulation

    (1997)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

      2022, Practical Cardiology: Principles and Approaches
    • French Society of Cardiology guidelines on exercise tests (part 1): Methods and interpretation

      2018, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      For diagnostic purposes, the interpretation of an ET must be multivariable [42,43], and indicate a high, intermediate or weak probability for myocardial ischemia. Several factors must be taken into account, including disease prevalence, presence of risk factors, symptoms, electrocardiogram changes and possible abnormal changes in HR and BP during exercise and immediate recovery [43,44]. A few scoring systems (Duke Treadmill Score [45], Ashley [46]) aid in the establishment of diagnosis and prognosis of CAD patients, stratifying them into one of the three possible risk groups (Table 6).

    • Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

      2017, Practical Cardiology
    • Stable angina pectoris

      2017, Coronary Artery Disease: From Biology to Clinical Practice
    • Revisiting age-predicted maximal heart rate: Can it be used as a valid measure of effort?

      2016, American Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although APMHR is not able to accurately predict an individual's maximal exercise HR, there may still be utility in its clinical use. There is a robust body of literature indicating chronotropic incompetence, commonly defined as an inability to achieve at least 85% of APMHR,3 is a prognostically ominous marker.16–21 As such, the assessment of the chronotropic response to exercise by comparing the HR response to maximal exercise in relation to APMHR may still provide clinically valuable information.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text